Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e52113, 2024 Jan 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38261378

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Large language models such as GPT-4 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4) are being increasingly used in medicine and medical education. However, these models are prone to "hallucinations" (ie, outputs that seem convincing while being factually incorrect). It is currently unknown how these errors by large language models relate to the different cognitive levels defined in Bloom's taxonomy. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore how GPT-4 performs in terms of Bloom's taxonomy using psychosomatic medicine exam questions. METHODS: We used a large data set of psychosomatic medicine multiple-choice questions (N=307) with real-world results derived from medical school exams. GPT-4 answered the multiple-choice questions using 2 distinct prompt versions: detailed and short. The answers were analyzed using a quantitative approach and a qualitative approach. Focusing on incorrectly answered questions, we categorized reasoning errors according to the hierarchical framework of Bloom's taxonomy. RESULTS: GPT-4's performance in answering exam questions yielded a high success rate: 93% (284/307) for the detailed prompt and 91% (278/307) for the short prompt. Questions answered correctly by GPT-4 had a statistically significant higher difficulty than questions answered incorrectly (P=.002 for the detailed prompt and P<.001 for the short prompt). Independent of the prompt, GPT-4's lowest exam performance was 78.9% (15/19), thereby always surpassing the "pass" threshold. Our qualitative analysis of incorrect answers, based on Bloom's taxonomy, showed that errors were primarily in the "remember" (29/68) and "understand" (23/68) cognitive levels; specific issues arose in recalling details, understanding conceptual relationships, and adhering to standardized guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: GPT-4 demonstrated a remarkable success rate when confronted with psychosomatic medicine multiple-choice exam questions, aligning with previous findings. When evaluated through Bloom's taxonomy, our data revealed that GPT-4 occasionally ignored specific facts (remember), provided illogical reasoning (understand), or failed to apply concepts to a new situation (apply). These errors, which were confidently presented, could be attributed to inherent model biases and the tendency to generate outputs that maximize likelihood.


Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Medicina , Medicina Psicosomática , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación
2.
Front Neurosci ; 16: 1030397, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36570852

RESUMEN

Introduction: Face-to-face medical and psychotherapeutic treatments during the Corona pandemic often involve patients and health care providers wearing face masks. We performed a pilot survey assessing the subjective experience of wearing face masks during psychotherapy sessions regarding (i) feasibility, (ii) psychotherapeutic treatment and (iii) communication, emotion and working alliance in patients and healthcare professionals. Methods: A total of n = 62 inpatients (RR = 95.4%) and n = 33 healthcare professionals (RR = 86.8%) at an academic department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy participated in this survey anonymously. The items of the questionnaire were created by the interprofessional expert team and were based on existing instruments: (i) the Therapeutic Relationship Questionnaire and (ii) the German translation of Yalom's Questionnaire on Experiencing in Group Psychotherapy. Results: The majority of patients rate their psychotherapy as highly profitable despite the mask. In individual therapy, face masks seem to have a rather low impact on subjective experience of psychotherapy and the relationship to the psychotherapist. Most patients reported using alternative facial expressions and expressions. In the interactional group therapy, masks were rather hindering. On the healthcare professional side, there were more frequent negative associations of face masks in relation to (i) experiencing connectedness with colleagues, (ii) forming relationships, and (iii) therapeutic treatment. Discussion: Information should be given to patients about the possible effects of face masks on the recognition of emotions, possible misinterpretations and compensation possibilities through alternative stimuli (e.g., eye area) and they should be encouraged to ask for further information. Especially in group therapy, with patients from other cultural backgrounds and in cases of need for help (e.g., hearing impairment) or complex disorders, appropriate non-verbal gestures and body language should be used to match the intended emotional expression.

3.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0277525, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36355852

RESUMEN

COVID-19 had a tremendous effect on medical education. Most teaching sessions had to be shifted online, posing additional stress and potential isolation on medical students. However, it also offered the promotion of innovative digital teaching concepts. In this article, an approach to undergraduate mental health training is presented and evaluated. The curriculum was designed according to Kern's six-step approach and consisted of asynchronous online material as well synchronous digital teaching and was accompanied by a plethora of newly developed teaching material (videos, fact sheets, etc.). Content covered the whole spectrum of diseases seen in a service of psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy (i.e. anxiety, depression, trauma, somatoform and eating disorders, as well as motivational interviewing). Feedback from participants was collected, and exam results (written and practical) were compared to pre-COVID-19 times using t-tests for dependent and independent samples. Students were highly satisfied with the teaching (rating of 1.3 ± 0.6, n = 139 students). There was no significant difference from course evaluations before COVID-19 (1.5 ± 0.5, p > .05). The teaching also received an award in the students' competition "best digital teaching concept in summer term 2020". In the written exams, there was no significant difference between before COVID-19 (2.4 ± 0.45) and during COVID-19 times (1.6 ± 0.39; p > .05). In the practical objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), there was also no significant difference between students' judgement of the difficulty of the station (1.9 ± 0.22 vs 1.9 ± 0.31; p > .05) or how well-prepared they felt for the exam (2.0 ± 0.24 vs 2.0 ± 0.31; p > .05). However, there was a significant difference in terms of grades, with the pre-COVID-19 grades being significantly better (2.7 ± 0.37 vs 2.0 ± 0.44; p < .05), which reflects the difficulty of transferring practical skills training to an online setting. Students particularly valued the possibility of self-directed learning combined with personal guidance by departmental experts, reflecting the importance of wellbeing-centred medical education. The pandemic triggered overnight challenges for teaching mental health that may also offer the opportunity to think about worldwide teaching standards with easily accessible material and courses online. This may offer the opportunity to enthral medical students to become mental health specialists themselves.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Competencia Clínica , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos
4.
Front Psychiatry ; 13: 1033020, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36684012

RESUMEN

Background: Chronic pain (CP), a complex biopsychosocial disorder with a global prevalence of up to 33%, can be treated by following multidisciplinary approaches that may include cannabis-based medicine (CBM). However, because CBM continues to be a new treatment, questions remain regarding the ideal duration for CBM and its psychosocial determinants, including mental comorbidities. Methods: In a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 46 patients with CP (ICD-10 code F45.4-), three validated instruments-the German Pain Questionnaire, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS), and the Marburg Questionnaire of Habitual WellBeing-were used to identify pain-specific psychosocial determinants and mental disorders. Descriptive analyses, a group differences analysis, and a logistic regression analysis were performed using SPSS. Results: The patients most frequently reported low back pain as the primary location of their CP, and in attributing the condition to tissue damage, most had largely adopted a somatic orientation in conceptualizing their illness. Most had experienced CP for more than 5 years (M = 5.13 years, SD = 1.41) and, as a consequence, faced significant restrictions in their everyday life and exhibited low subjective wellbeing (MFHW median = 4.00, N = 43, Q1: 2.00, Q3: 9.00, range: 0-20). Comorbidities among the patients included depression, (DASS-Depression, median: 11.50, Q1: 7.00, Q3: 16.25), anxiety (DASS-Anxiety, median: 4.50, Q1: 2.75, Q3: 8.00), and stress (DASS-Stress, median: 11.00, Q1: 7.00, Q3: 15.00). Between the two cannabis-based treatments with a course lasting either less or more than a year, the duration of treatment showed no between-group differences in terms of sociodemographic factors, pain-specific factors, conceptualizations of the illness, or mental disorders. Psychosocial determinants such as subjective wellbeing and mental comorbidities were not significant predictors of the duration of cannabis-based treatment. Conclusion: We found no evidence indicating that the benefits of short-term vs. long-term cannabis-based treatment can be predicted by mental comorbidities or psychosocial factors. However, because CBM may be included in approaches to treat CP, questions about the ideal duration of such treatment remain to be answered.

5.
BMJ Open ; 9(8): e029738, 2019 08 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31383708

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: With the growing prevalence of overweight and obesity, medical students should be prepared to engage in weight management and obesity-related communications in order to prevent patients from having stigmatising experiences. In addition, medical students should have training to reduce anti-fat prejudices. DESIGN: Cross-sectional proof of concept study. SETTING: University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 246 participants (207 second-year medical students, 13 standardised patients (SPs) and 22 teachers) took part in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the assessment of degree of reality of the encounter with the SP wearing an obesity simulation suit (OSS). The secondary outcome was the evaluation of students' awareness and prejudice against patients with obesity in a simulated role play. Additionally, a description of the advantages and disadvantages when using such a teaching tool is delivered. RESULTS: The OSS contributed to a realistic perception of the patient group depicted in a role play according to students, teachers and SPs. OSS body mass index estimation by students, teachers and SPs correctly was over 30 kg/m2-thus in the range of obesity. In a selected subscale of the Anti-Fat Attitudes Test, students showed significantly stronger anti-fat stigmatisation compared with teachers and SPs. CONCLUSIONS: An OSS worn by an SP is a valuable teaching tool to raise awareness about patients with obesity. It gives a realistic picture of the encounter. Stigmatisation was low in general but was especially present in the students. Further research should include intervention studies to address this issue.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Obesidad , Desempeño de Papel , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Estudiantes de Medicina , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prejuicio , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Estereotipo , Adulto Joven
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30544950

RESUMEN

(1) Medical doctors and medical students show increased psychological stress levels. International medical students seem to be particularly vulnerable. (2) We compared different methods of assessing stress levels in international and local first year medical students. First, study participants completed questionnaires related to stress, depression, empathy, and self-efficacy (MBI, PSQ, PHQ-9, JSPE-S, and GSE) at three separate points in time (T1 to T3). Second, their heart rate variabilities (HRVs) were recorded in an oral examination, a seminar, and in a relaxing situation. Third, hair samples were collected at the beginning and at the end of the semester to assess the cortisol concentration. (3) Included were 20 international and 20 local first semester medical students. At T1, we found considerable differences between international and local students in the JSPE-S; at T2 in the MBI factor "professional efficacy", the PHQ-9, and in the JSPE-S; and at T3 in the MBI factors "cynicism" and "professional efficacy", the PHQ-9, and in the JSPE-S. International and local students also differed concerning their HRVs during relaxation. Over the course of the semester, international students showed changes in the MBI factors "emotional exhaustion" and "professional efficacy", the PHQ-9, and the GSE. Local students showed changes in the GSE. No effects were found for students' hair cortisol concentrations. (4) All participants showed low levels of stress. However, while international students experienced their stress levels to decrease over the course of the semester, local students found their stress levels to increase.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Percepción , Psicometría/métodos , Psicofisiología/métodos , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino
7.
Z Psychosom Med Psychother ; 64(2): 198-210, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29862923

RESUMEN

Teaching about chronic pain in psychosomatics courses - an overview of the situation in Germany and the Tübingen Model Objectives: When dealing with chronic pain patients it is crucial to take a bio-psycho-social approach. However, it is unclear how this approach is currently being taught to medical students, and how they judge its role and importance. METHODS: We carried out a qualitative study (questionnaire) asking (1) German psychosomatic departments about pain-related teaching and (2) medical undergraduates about pain-relevant issues. RESULTS: Bio-psycho-social facts are well represented within psychosomatics courses but only theoretically tested. There is still much room for improvement through cross-linking with other disciplines. In Tübingen, "psychosocial factors" and the "empathic doctor-patient relationship" play a significantly higher role when teaching psychosomatic courses than somatic ones. There were no significant differences regarding the role of an "integrative recording of medical history" or how the importance of any of the three topics was rated. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain is well represented in psychosomatic courses in Germany, though exams could be more practical. The establishment of interdisciplinary approaches beyond the teaching of core psychosomatic content could be expanded and especially used more frequently when adapting curricula to competence-based standards.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/psicología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Modelos Educacionales , Medicina Psicosomática/educación , Enseñanza , Curriculum , Alemania , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Colaboración Intersectorial , Neurología/educación , Neurocirugia/educación , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA